The study of race and dialectical materialism has been a topic of interest for many scholars over the years. Dialectical materialism is a theory of human society that emphasizes the important role of material conditions on social change. This theory suggests that human beings are products of their environment and that any change in society is caused by an interaction between the material conditions of people’s lives and the ideas they have about them. In other words, the way people think about their environment, and how they interact with it, ultimately shapes their society. Race, on the other hand, is an attempt to classify humanity into different groups based on physical characteristics.When examining the relationship between race and dialectical materialism, it is important to note that many scholars have suggested that race is a product of society’s material conditions. In other words, racial divisions are created as a result of the unequal distribution of resources and opportunities within a given society. For example, if one group of people has access to more resources than another, then this unequal distribution can lead to racial divisions. As such, it can be argued that race is not an innate characteristic of human beings but instead is a result of the material conditions in which people live.At the same time, however, it is also important to note that race can also affect these material conditions. For instance, studies suggest that racism in the workplace can lead to unequal access to resources and opportunities based on one’s racial background. This in turn can have an impact on individuals’ ability to participate in social change or progress within their communities. In this way, it can be argued that race can both be affected by material conditions, as well as shape them.This relationship between race and dialectical materialism can also be seen in the idea of ‘racialization’. In this context, racialization refers to the process by which certain groups are socially assigned certain characteristics due to their racial identity. For example, if one group is seen as inferior or less capable than another due to its racial identity, then this can lead to unequal access to resources and opportunities within a given society. As such, it can be argued that racism has an important influence on dialogical materialism as it can shape how people interact with their environment. Finally, it should also be noted that race and dialectical materialism are not mutually exclusive concepts. Rather, they both interact with one another in order to shape societal dynamics and inequalities. In other words, both race and dialectical materialism must be taken into consideration when examining how social change occurs within a given society. By understanding this relationship between race and dialectical materialism, scholars may be better able to identify patterns of inequality within societies and create solutions that address them.